I chose to learn more about the Early Childhood Australia website located at www.earlychildhoodaustralia.org. It is very similar to the National Association of Education for Young Children of the United States because it seeks to provide provision for the high-quality services for all young children from birth to eight years of age, along with their families. It supports parents and the roles that they play in the lives of their children. Early Childhood Australia is focusing research on some of the same issues that are facing children in the states...issues of good health, respecting diversity in the education system, bullying, young children and aggression, engaging families, and types of assessment. These were just a few of the research topics that were described in their Research In Practice Series which is a collection of practical and easy to read resources that offer effective new approaches for anyone facing challenges that affect the early childhood field. One of the topics that really caught my attention was the use of portfolios as a way of assessing children in kindergarten. A portfolio is a collection of organized, purposeful information about the individual student that provides insights and an overview of their learning and development over time. What is so great about the portfolio is that the student, as well as teachers and parents, can place things in the portfolio and discuss why it was placed there. From this website I have learned that portfolios provide a valuable way to strengthen the communication between the children, their parents, and the school. Finding ways to create strong partnerships with all those involved in a child's live builds a child's capacity for learning and development.
Reference:
http://www.earlychildhoodaustralia.org.au/
Saturday, March 31, 2012
Saturday, March 17, 2012
RESEARCH THAT BENEFITS CHILDREN AND FAMILIES
As a first grade teacher, I was disheartened at the beginning of each year when I received records for students from kindergarten that included children who were extremely below level, but they were sent to first grade anyway. It was beyond me how the administration expected me to “work a miracle” and get these children ready for 2nd grade when they had not even mastered kindergarten material. That is why the article “Holding Back: Retention Won’t Cure What Ails Students…” caught my attention.
Since the 1970s studies have demonstrated that retention does not have positive effects for most low-achieving students. Recent students have indicated that grade retention does not improve students’ chances for educational success down the road. In fact, research shows that retention is often harmful to academic development. Sometimes retention is suggested for nonacademic reasons…the student may not be mature enough or lacks social skills. Also children who are retained may not do better academically later in life. A study of 1, 539 Chicago school children who graduated from public kindergartens in 1986 indicate that children who are retained do not improve their academic performance as compared to other students their age or the other students in their grade. It was found that over time the students fall further and further behind. Grade retention also has the unintended consequence of contributing to the dropout rate.
Present research shows that retaining students greatly increased the likelihood of their dropping out of school. When comparing students with similar academic profiles in the early grades, it was found that 30 percent of those in the sample who were retained had dropped out of school by age 17. Only 21 percent of students who were not retained had dropped out by the same age. However, promoting low achieving students is not the answer either. School districts and administrators have to come up with creative ways of providing a long lasting quality education for its students. An example of a successful alternative strategy is the Chicago public schools’ Child Parent Center and Expansion Program. This program is over 30 years old and is a comprehensive intervention program for students in preschool to third grade. It emphasizes basic skills, parent involvement, and small class sizes. The good thing is that students who participate in this program are less likely to be candidates for retention.
In the experiences that I have witnessed, most of the parents have never truly agreed with retention and viewed it as a negative alternative. A few have just gone along with it because of not knowing what else to do. This article provides a positive outcome to an otherwise sad situation. No parent wants to hear that their child is behind and is not making adequate progress. However, if they have positive alternatives like summer tutoring or enrichment programs instead of retention for the next year, they may be more apt to listen to what the school has to say.
Reference:
Reynolds, A., Temple, J. & McCoy A. (October, 1997). Holding back: Retention won’t cure what ails students : North sports final edition. Chicago Tribune. Retrieved from http://ezp.waldenulibrary.org/login?url=http://search.proquest.com.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/docview/418337227?accountid=14872.
Since the 1970s studies have demonstrated that retention does not have positive effects for most low-achieving students. Recent students have indicated that grade retention does not improve students’ chances for educational success down the road. In fact, research shows that retention is often harmful to academic development. Sometimes retention is suggested for nonacademic reasons…the student may not be mature enough or lacks social skills. Also children who are retained may not do better academically later in life. A study of 1, 539 Chicago school children who graduated from public kindergartens in 1986 indicate that children who are retained do not improve their academic performance as compared to other students their age or the other students in their grade. It was found that over time the students fall further and further behind. Grade retention also has the unintended consequence of contributing to the dropout rate.
Present research shows that retaining students greatly increased the likelihood of their dropping out of school. When comparing students with similar academic profiles in the early grades, it was found that 30 percent of those in the sample who were retained had dropped out of school by age 17. Only 21 percent of students who were not retained had dropped out by the same age. However, promoting low achieving students is not the answer either. School districts and administrators have to come up with creative ways of providing a long lasting quality education for its students. An example of a successful alternative strategy is the Chicago public schools’ Child Parent Center and Expansion Program. This program is over 30 years old and is a comprehensive intervention program for students in preschool to third grade. It emphasizes basic skills, parent involvement, and small class sizes. The good thing is that students who participate in this program are less likely to be candidates for retention.
In the experiences that I have witnessed, most of the parents have never truly agreed with retention and viewed it as a negative alternative. A few have just gone along with it because of not knowing what else to do. This article provides a positive outcome to an otherwise sad situation. No parent wants to hear that their child is behind and is not making adequate progress. However, if they have positive alternatives like summer tutoring or enrichment programs instead of retention for the next year, they may be more apt to listen to what the school has to say.
Reference:
Reynolds, A., Temple, J. & McCoy A. (October, 1997). Holding back: Retention won’t cure what ails students : North sports final edition. Chicago Tribune. Retrieved from http://ezp.waldenulibrary.org/login?url=http://search.proquest.com.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/docview/418337227?accountid=14872.
Saturday, March 10, 2012
MY RESEARCH JOURNEY
Our course text(Mac Naughton, Rolfe, & Siraj-Blatchford, 2010) states that when you are choosing a research project you first need to choose a topic that interests you personally. Immediately I knew that I wanted to learn more about educating children with special needs/learning difficulties while incorporating music/poetry and parental connections. My last three years of teaching have left me perplexed about how our high functioning autistic children are being educated in the public school system. I also want to learn more about the different types of learning disabilities as well because I always had students who did not qualify for any type of special education services but could not function day to day in a regular education classroom. Americans have always put their faith in the power of education to enrich the lives of children and make our nation stronger. One of the biggest challenges facing education today is providing the best, most effective education possible for children and youth with special needs or learning problems. For many years pull-out programs have been the approach to serving these children. In many instances these programs have failed to meet their educational, and social needs (Will, 1986). This week I have found many articles and websites that support the idea of inclusion teaching methods. What I have found out through my own personal experience is that inclusion works only if all parties involved...teachers, administrators, parents, and students know what is expected daily and what the ending goals are.
References:
Mac Naughton, G., Rolfe, S.A., & Siraj-Blatchford, I. (2010). Doing early childhood research: International perspectives on theory and practice (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Will, M.C., (February, 1986). Educating children with learning problems:a shared responsibility. Exceptional Children. Retrieved from http://eden.rutgers.edu/-nork/SNS/Educating%20Children%20with%20learning%20problems.pdf.
References:
Mac Naughton, G., Rolfe, S.A., & Siraj-Blatchford, I. (2010). Doing early childhood research: International perspectives on theory and practice (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Will, M.C., (February, 1986). Educating children with learning problems:a shared responsibility. Exceptional Children. Retrieved from http://eden.rutgers.edu/-nork/SNS/Educating%20Children%20with%20learning%20problems.pdf.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)